tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.comments2023-10-27T19:29:31.279-07:00Operation Billiards - Mitrokhin or Oshchenko ?mjshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comBlogger266125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-84672494943610397962019-12-01T16:53:03.626-08:002019-12-01T16:53:03.626-08:00Can you please send me an email to parellic@google...Can you please send me an email to parellic@googlemail.com and I will put you in touch with Tony.mjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-87804073264317558302019-12-01T14:35:29.826-08:002019-12-01T14:35:29.826-08:00Hi I am doing some research on the passing of my f...Hi I am doing some research on the passing of my father and I have read a few articles which relate to Tony holland reciveing stolen goods from my father melvin hodgson and I would like to make contact with Tony to find more out about my dad Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13483201644200603068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-30749473729469450982018-02-11T10:00:18.879-08:002018-02-11T10:00:18.879-08:00I WAS THERE AT THE SAME TIME(MALE) AND WAS CAPTAIN...I WAS THERE AT THE SAME TIME(MALE) AND WAS CAPTAIN OF MOST SPORTS INPARTICULAR CRICKET AND FOOTBALL AND IF I REMEMBER IT WAS "BRUNS" HOUSE IF SPELT CORRECTLY--SOME TIME PAST. SINCE THEN ABROAD MAINLY. WBAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-81277859479126329722017-06-01T13:53:15.282-07:002017-06-01T13:53:15.282-07:00Free speech is the principle that our society thin...Free speech is the principle that our society thinks it is founded on. Unfortunately, all too often, there are individuals out there who don't want us to express our views. Never feel intimidated by these characters. Things do change and I am sure you are not the only one who knows that discussion is being shut down.mjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-59791833808048336782017-06-01T06:47:37.451-07:002017-06-01T06:47:37.451-07:00I have been a member of the site for a number of y...I have been a member of the site for a number of years, and there are a certain group of posters who gang up on other posters who do not share their point of view. There is also a certain Ex RAF mod who closes down anyone who does not share his biased point of view. These two things have spoiled the forum. It is no longer a place where you can have a decent debate. It has become quite boring reading the same narrow minded dimwitted shit that these morons post.I would say that by not being a member you are missing nothing! There were decent people there but the moronic sheep have driven them away.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-84354452215962078072016-09-11T03:56:13.017-07:002016-09-11T03:56:13.017-07:00I knew him in the TAVR and civilian life - he was ...I knew him in the TAVR and civilian life - he was a bit weird!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-30927343334028408222014-07-27T01:14:29.377-07:002014-07-27T01:14:29.377-07:00These photos don't prove anything that you jus...These photos don't prove anything that you just said. <br /><br />It is a fact that Hamas is a terror organization, and that their strategy to get the world's support (which is used to build more terror - another historical fact) is through endangering their own people. The UN found rockets in schools, and UNWRA has just admitted that the school that was hit was fired by a Hamas bomb.<br /><br />Google IDF / Israel, and tell me if you see a culture that would deliberately target civilians? When have you heard about an Israeli terror? <br /><br />As for your control of middle east history, please return to your sources again sir. There was no such thing as Palestinians. They were immigrants from all over the world, just as the Jews, and no land was taken. It was the entire Arab world that tried to diminish Israel numerous times, just for being Jews and because the Arab world wants the middle east for themselves. The UN has approved to partition the land back in 47 and establish 2 states, but the Arabs didn't want to!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-15246214200603858642014-05-08T06:30:35.239-07:002014-05-08T06:30:35.239-07:00I do not know the answers to your questions, but p...I do not know the answers to your questions, but perhaps somebody else knows the answers?mjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-56291893292119992452014-05-06T02:14:57.791-07:002014-05-06T02:14:57.791-07:00This story came to my attention only some months a...This story came to my attention only some months ago and I think that there is a lot more to the story than told in the book. It's certainly well-written in a manner of Da Vinci Code, The Game of Thrones, etc. But it's puzzling why is he so condescending to local people; calling them irritatingly through 400+ pages "the little people," occasional Croat neanderthal, frightened, unarmed Muslim soldiers 'troglodytes,' but serbs are just friendly 'blackboards.' It says a lot, it not spy he certainly tried to be gentle on the Serb side. It could be because his father was a Serb chetnik and as such banned from the former Yugoslavia. But, that also leads to the question why has the British Army kept that man in Bosnia where he clearly could fall under spell due to his family background? Why did they change his name on the first place when there were hundreds of other interpreters work under their real ethnic names for all the foreign players? And why did they send Stankovic out against the shrink recommendation? Why was his boss in Kuwait in the first place reject to send him to ex-Yugoslavia when the conflict first erupted? Suspicions that his political view may put him in trouble? Now, why is there no formal apology and compensation from the army if they accused him wrongly? it seems to me that the it did not come to prosecution because something was hushed up in a big way. What happened to General Rose's career later? Would any evidence of Stankovic's wrongdoing smear his name as well? Could it all be just baseless mistake? One thing is certain, being in the army or foreign office, one's loyalty must be total, 100%, especially in today's world where even a smallest bias can cause terrible consequences. Clark just changed hats for fun and photo and his career has never been the same. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-77217169286444771982014-03-27T11:39:14.626-07:002014-03-27T11:39:14.626-07:00The school's main entrance was in Fulbrook Lan...The school's main entrance was in Fulbrook Lane, but there was a second entrance in Garron Lane where the canteen was located.mjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-85544389168925103962014-03-27T08:30:11.453-07:002014-03-27T08:30:11.453-07:00i remember courts school but cant remember where i...i remember courts school but cant remember where it was.what road was it in Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-62953413815687230322014-02-18T13:27:24.141-08:002014-02-18T13:27:24.141-08:00Dear Anonymous, I do not know if you are referring...Dear Anonymous, I do not know if you are referring to a particular case (which?), or are making more of a general point, but I agree with your sentiments. Unscrupulous barristers and QCs should be put on trial and sent to prison for their unethical support of our corrupted justice system. Only when there is a fear of exposure of wrongdoing will these criminals in the legal system get flushed away to where they belong.mjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-42635273907145273122014-02-18T08:34:05.254-08:002014-02-18T08:34:05.254-08:00Well done. Even if you (M.J Smith) are guilty as ...Well done. Even if you (M.J Smith) are guilty as sin, you are still showing the absolute necessity in a just society of having a (verifiably) independent body which investigates senior barristers who can be shown to have manipulated and distorted evidence, presented false evidence and lied to the court. Cases can be extremely complex, and many "facts" can be contested, but the reprehensible practice of knowingly presenting unsupported assertions as though they were the established facts, and that there were no contrary established facts requiring refutation, should be universally discouraged. In a court setting even intelligent and attentive jurors cannot, for the most part, be apprised of more than a brief summary of the careful enquiries, gathering of evidence and painstaking reasoning that has gone into producing 'the established facts' in a complex case. That doesn't mean all of these 'established facts' are correct and that they cannot be rationally contested, discredited or downgraded, or shown to be of lesser or no relevance, but how can it be right to allow them to be swept away by persuasion alone? How can it be right that wealthy clients and taxpayer-funded public authorities can be effectively shielded from the law by massively overpaid barristers whose principal role is to distort the truth, lie far more convincingly than could their clients, and use sophistry and legal trickery to persuade relatively uninformed and uninterested juries? How can this be tolerated, and how can the ethical standards the legal perpetrators are supposed to meet allow them to remain unaccountable? Naming and shaming is not enough, the worst examples and worst offenders should be investigated as a matter of course. A determined, transparent, no-privilege and no-exceptions drive must be made to clean out the stables, in order to make the justice system capable of delivering justice. Appropriate and consistent sentencing needs much improvement, but it is getting to the truth (or as near as is reasonably possible) which is the major part of that battle. While investigative procedures and techniques have made tremendous progress, all this honest endeavour is constantly offset by the quite extraordinary encouragement given by the courts to dishonest, unaccountable barristers. Indeed, the ones most skilled in defeating justice are also among those most likely to be made QCs or even judges.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-18090244321106903562014-02-18T08:32:07.790-08:002014-02-18T08:32:07.790-08:00Well done. Even if you (M.J Smith) are guilty as ...Well done. Even if you (M.J Smith) are guilty as sin, you are still showing the absolute necessity in a just society of having a (verifiably) independent body which investigates senior barristers who can be shown to have manipulated and distorted evidence, presented false evidence and lied to the court. Cases can be extremely complex, and many "facts" can be contested, but the reprehensible practice of knowingly presenting unsupported assertions as though they were the established facts, and that there were no contrary established facts requiring refutation, should be universally discouraged. In a court setting even intelligent and attentive jurors cannot, for the most part, be apprised of more than a brief summary of the careful enquiries, gathering of evidence and painstaking reasoning that has gone into producing 'the established facts' in a complex case. That doesn't mean all of these 'established facts' are correct and that they cannot be rationally contested, discredited or downgraded, or shown to be of lesser or no relevance, but how can it be right to allow them to be swept away by persuasion alone? How can it be right that wealthy clients and taxpayer-funded public authorities can be effectively shielded from the law by massively overpaid barristers whose principal role is to distort the truth, lie far more convincingly than could their clients, and use sophistry and legal trickery to persuade relatively uninformed and uninterested juries? How can this be tolerated, and how can the ethical standards the legal perpetrators are supposed to meet allow them to remain unaccountable? Naming and shaming is not enough, the worst examples and worst offenders should be investigated as a matter of course. A determined, transparent, no-privilege and no-exceptions drive must be made to clean out the stables, in order to make the justice system capable of delivering justice. Appropriate and consistent sentencing needs much improvement, but it is getting to the truth (or as near as is reasonably possible) which is the major part of that battle. While investigative procedures and techniques have made tremendous progress, all this honest endeavour is constantly offset by the quite extraordinary encouragement given by the courts to dishonest, unaccountable barristers. Indeed, the ones most skilled in defeating justice are also among those most likely to be made QCs or even judges.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-77330190490207622492013-03-10T03:32:01.808-07:002013-03-10T03:32:01.808-07:00WHY CANT U USE UR BRAINS ISRAEL. RATHER THAN MIRRO...WHY CANT U USE UR BRAINS ISRAEL. RATHER THAN MIRRORING HAMAS. USE SNIPERS N UR STRATEGIC TACTICAL BRAIN CELLS TO PLAN IT OUT WITHOUT KILLING OR INJURING CIVILIANS BEING AROUND THE LOCATION. DO U HONESTLY THINK THOSE PARENTS WANTED THEIR KIDS TO DIE? I HOPE YOUR ASKING FOR IT TO HAPPEN TO YOU. I BLAME BOTH HAMAS N ISRAEL. DONT ASK SO INNOCENT AS IF THOSE LIVES U TOOK AND BLAME IT ON HAMAS ONLY. YOUR AT FAULT TO AND OWN IT UP ISRAEL. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-23860194322040471962013-02-20T11:34:23.041-08:002013-02-20T11:34:23.041-08:00John Blofeld was unkind to a pupil I can never for...John Blofeld was unkind to a pupil I can never forget that i winess his cruel wordsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-37003419825418369322013-02-13T06:55:50.209-08:002013-02-13T06:55:50.209-08:00That chambers earns far to much money and for what...That chambers earns far to much money and for what it should go to hard working nursesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-39747121701116402842013-02-05T04:15:25.569-08:002013-02-05T04:15:25.569-08:00I knew Richard Glennister when he was an undergrad...I knew Richard Glennister when he was an undergraduate at Oxford. He was a kind, considerate person who I liked immensely. Sadly, with time, we lost contact.<br /><br />His father died suddenly when Richard was about 20. I hope Richard is still alive and enjoying life.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-44354571928909610772013-01-09T11:03:50.984-08:002013-01-09T11:03:50.984-08:00I think you meant www.100mphspeedingscam.comI think you meant www.100mphspeedingscam.commjshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18016722935977762769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-8565929692630486142013-01-09T10:19:28.489-08:002013-01-09T10:19:28.489-08:00Half a dozen cover ups from the police and the IPC...Half a dozen cover ups from the police and the IPCC, I'm no crook, I'm an ordinary bloke who expects the police to do their jobs not go around locking up victims of assault and letting the attackers runs fre! www.wdh.me.uk <br />But it doesn't stop there, the police AND the IPCC are as corrupt as each other as the IPCC employs lots of retired cops.... to the point were a cop can frame someone without evidence (not even word on word!) and when they are caught out by their fraudulant pocket books the police and the IPCC will serve no purpose but to cover it up with any means they can, even more lies! www100mphspeedingscam.com<br />Complaining does not work, only violence stops the police!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-42120667761251264252012-06-08T06:20:55.383-07:002012-06-08T06:20:55.383-07:00Thank you for your writing and exposure of uncomfo...Thank you for your writing and exposure of uncomfortable facts you are a brave and analitical guyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-31648994166017641882012-06-08T06:19:40.320-07:002012-06-08T06:19:40.320-07:00I saw this amazing piece in the Idependent.This is...I saw this amazing piece in the Idependent.This is what the carryings on amounts to in that chambers of which David Cocks Q C was the head.I dont know much about thing but if this is how they carry on.......<br />"This year's Ebenezer Scrooge Award goes to David Cocks, QC, who has chosen the Christmas season to serve a summons on Felicity seeking to end the £10,000 per year maintenance he pays for their illegitimate child, also named David. Their one-year affair – he was her pupil master in chambers – took place during her pupillage. Earlier this year, it emerged in a parliamentary answer that Cocks receives almost £500,000 in fees for his prosecutorial work. At 71 he draws a state and a private pension, and also does private and and legal aid work, garnering another £200,000. He has a 200-acre farm in the West Country, which helps offset his tax liability. Felicity pays their son's university fees out of her modest savings. The son, who is registered disabled, wishes to continue full-time education. I have followed this sorry saga from the time when Cocks denied paternity on oath, through his efforts to exhaust Hammerton with legal ploys, through his attempts to take David out of private school, through criticism of his conduct by the Family Court – and now this. The hearing is set down for 3 January. I hope Cocks receives a visit from the Ghost of Christmas Future and is confronted with his hellish prospects. "Written by Christopher Silvester,son of the band leader Victor Silvester.<br />Not many have the guts to expose people you should be a full time journalist.I am much impressed by your courage to speak out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-43649337968558876632012-05-30T09:04:20.887-07:002012-05-30T09:04:20.887-07:00Good on you to raise itGood on you to raise itAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-80271863299750239902012-05-30T09:03:17.419-07:002012-05-30T09:03:17.419-07:00I have just read this ,amazing that you have broug...I have just read this ,amazing that you have brought it out .Some one had read your blog about John Blofeld and his treatment in the David Cocks scandal and it has certainly hit home.A man they say who behaves badly oneway generally behaves badly another,this conversation took place during an adjournment in the Court of Appeal where your blog was mentioned between barristers totally registering on the conduct of John Blofeld.I am glad that these things come to light you deserve a medal of the hightest order,not enough people speak out when they do it has enormous effect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21074984.post-21301327293342148732012-04-23T08:39:25.754-07:002012-04-23T08:39:25.754-07:00Great that you survived with a voice and spiritGreat that you survived with a voice and spiritAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com